William Lane Craig came to speak today about “Theism, Atheism and the Big Bang”. I feel like every point he made felt dubious, but seeing as how he partially introduced me to the teleological argument and the cosmological argument and he’s well studied in philosophy and some cosmology/astronomy and he’s more and he’s a good debater and rhetorician so fuck it i don’t know I guess you win this round WLC.
You do know that the teleological and the cosmological arguments are both nonsense right? Just look up any discussion on the topic where an actual rational thinker participated and you’ll see what I mean.
For example, Christopher Hitchens completely smashed these arguments in his debate with WLC back in 2009. It’s just pathetic that WLC is still using those weak arguments as “proof” of the existence of his god.
Check out this thread at Philosophy Forums for more in-depth analysis.










